Moderators:mpharris36, GONYK, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Capn’O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule Post Reply - Print view 1979 posts - Page 92 of 99

• Jump to page:
• Previous
• 1
• …
• 90
• 91
• 92
• 93
• 94
• …
• 99
• Next

Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread

thebuzzardmanRealGMPosts: 74,565And1: 83,161Joined: Jun 24, 2006Location: VillanovknicksPost#1821 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 2:58 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread

• Quote Post#1821 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 2:58 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterDoesn’t Ingram have some of the Bridges issues, in that they are 3s who can only kind of play like 2s?Ingram brings more offense, that additional 3 level creator, but injury history and less defenseBridges brings more defense (or used to), not really an elite 3 level creator, more defense, mostly healthyJust not sureBrunsonIngram or BridgesOGRandleiShartReally works.Top thebuzzardmanRealGMPosts: 74,565And1: 83,161Joined: Jun 24, 2006Location: VillanovknicksPost#1821 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 2:58 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1821 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 2:58 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterDoesn’t Ingram have some of the Bridges issues, in that they are 3s who can only kind of play like 2s?Ingram brings more offense, that additional 3 level creator, but injury history and less defenseBridges brings more defense (or used to), not really an elite 3 level creator, more defense, mostly healthyJust not sureBrunsonIngram or BridgesOGRandleiShartReally works.- Quote Post#1821 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 2:58 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterDoesn’t Ingram have some of the Bridges issues, in that they are 3s who can only kind of play like 2s?Ingram brings more offense, that additional 3 level creator, but injury history and less defenseBridges brings more defense (or used to), not really an elite 3 level creator, more defense, mostly healthyJust not sureBrunsonIngram or BridgesOGRandleiShartReally works. Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread KnixinSixAssistant CoachPosts: 4,184And1: 1,942Joined: Jul 27, 2013Location: In the SpiritPost#1822 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:01 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1822 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:01 pm sol537 wrote:Only way Ingram makes sense is to re route him to Brooklyn for Bridges. We send out McBride as well and get Alvarado.Ingram makes some sense if we trade Randle. Also our frontcourt scoring is very weak aside from Randle. I could see it either way. There would be enough minutes for him to split between SF and PF. Players tend to blossom here and become even better players if they adjust well to Thibs system. I could see it.For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2nd Corinthians 4:6Top KnixinSixAssistant CoachPosts: 4,184And1: 1,942Joined: Jul 27, 2013Location: In the SpiritPost#1822 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:01 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1822 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:01 pm sol537 wrote:Only way Ingram makes sense is to re route him to Brooklyn for Bridges. We send out McBride as well and get Alvarado.Ingram makes some sense if we trade Randle. Also our frontcourt scoring is very weak aside from Randle. I could see it either way. There would be enough minutes for him to split between SF and PF. Players tend to blossom here and become even better players if they adjust well to Thibs system. I could see it.For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2nd Corinthians 4:6 - Quote Post#1822 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:01 pm sol537 wrote:Only way Ingram makes sense is to re route him to Brooklyn for Bridges. We send out McBride as well and get Alvarado.Ingram makes some sense if we trade Randle. Also our frontcourt scoring is very weak aside from Randle. I could see it either way. There would be enough minutes for him to split between SF and PF. Players tend to blossom here and become even better players if they adjust well to Thibs system. I could see it. For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2nd Corinthians 4:6 Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread FuryRealGMPosts: 23,050And1: 15,420Joined: Mar 07, 2007Post#1823 » by Fury » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:22 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1823 » by Fury » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:22 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here?Top FuryRealGMPosts: 23,050And1: 15,420Joined: Mar 07, 2007Post#1823 » by Fury » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:22 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1823 » by Fury » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:22 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here? - Quote Post#1823 » by Fury » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:22 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here? Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread thebuzzardmanRealGMPosts: 74,565And1: 83,161Joined: Jun 24, 2006Location: VillanovknicksPost#1824 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:23 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1824 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:23 pm The Knicks draft and any trades have a lot of moving parts.It’s pretty much a given they’ll resign OG, but we don’t know for exactly how much.Hartenstein is less of a given, but a probable. Even with iHart, things start to get weird/confusing. They might keep iHart but move Mitch. Mitch and Bogs might be combined in a trade for Bridges or Ingram. Maybe the Knicks solve backup PG in the Pelicans trade. Maybe the Knicks can get either Bridges or Ingram, but solve PG with Jokubitus, and Bogs option is picked up for a mid season trade. Maybe Jokubitus looks like sh*t in the summer league or the Knicks aren’t sold on him in general, so they release Bogs and use that money towards Melton. And so on. Knicks need some height depth on the wingThey could use a backup PGThey might need a backup C, depending on if iHart leaves or Mitch gets dealt. This impacts the draft as well. Do all the picks get traded? Do the Knicks use just one pick and choose from among backup PG, Center or wing defender? They probably trade one pick into the future, one of the 1st round picks.Top thebuzzardmanRealGMPosts: 74,565And1: 83,161Joined: Jun 24, 2006Location: VillanovknicksPost#1824 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:23 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1824 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:23 pm The Knicks draft and any trades have a lot of moving parts.It’s pretty much a given they’ll resign OG, but we don’t know for exactly how much.Hartenstein is less of a given, but a probable. Even with iHart, things start to get weird/confusing. They might keep iHart but move Mitch. Mitch and Bogs might be combined in a trade for Bridges or Ingram. Maybe the Knicks solve backup PG in the Pelicans trade. Maybe the Knicks can get either Bridges or Ingram, but solve PG with Jokubitus, and Bogs option is picked up for a mid season trade. Maybe Jokubitus looks like sh*t in the summer league or the Knicks aren’t sold on him in general, so they release Bogs and use that money towards Melton. And so on. Knicks need some height depth on the wingThey could use a backup PGThey might need a backup C, depending on if iHart leaves or Mitch gets dealt. This impacts the draft as well. Do all the picks get traded? Do the Knicks use just one pick and choose from among backup PG, Center or wing defender? They probably trade one pick into the future, one of the 1st round picks.- Quote Post#1824 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:23 pm The Knicks draft and any trades have a lot of moving parts.It’s pretty much a given they’ll resign OG, but we don’t know for exactly how much.Hartenstein is less of a given, but a probable. Even with iHart, things start to get weird/confusing. They might keep iHart but move Mitch. Mitch and Bogs might be combined in a trade for Bridges or Ingram. Maybe the Knicks solve backup PG in the Pelicans trade. Maybe the Knicks can get either Bridges or Ingram, but solve PG with Jokubitus, and Bogs option is picked up for a mid season trade. Maybe Jokubitus looks like sh*t in the summer league or the Knicks aren’t sold on him in general, so they release Bogs and use that money towards Melton. And so on. Knicks need some height depth on the wingThey could use a backup PGThey might need a backup C, depending on if iHart leaves or Mitch gets dealt. This impacts the draft as well. Do all the picks get traded? Do the Knicks use just one pick and choose from among backup PG, Center or wing defender? They probably trade one pick into the future, one of the 1st round picks. Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread god shammgodRealGMPosts: 134,087And1: 128,483Joined: Feb 18, 2006Post#1825 » by god shammgod » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:31 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1825 » by god shammgod » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:31 pm Guys here think you could keep shart as your only center when he couldn’t guard anyone in the playoffs. Sad.Top god shammgodRealGMPosts: 134,087And1: 128,483Joined: Feb 18, 2006Post#1825 » by god shammgod » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:31 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1825 » by god shammgod » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:31 pm Guys here think you could keep shart as your only center when he couldn’t guard anyone in the playoffs. Sad. - Quote Post#1825 » by god shammgod » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:31 pm Guys here think you could keep shart as your only center when he couldn’t guard anyone in the playoffs. Sad. Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread KnixinSixAssistant CoachPosts: 4,184And1: 1,942Joined: Jul 27, 2013Location: In the SpiritPost#1826 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:34 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1826 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:34 pm Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here?He’s mainly a 3 /4 . Even if we kept Randle it probably would look something like thisMinutes distribution IHart(32)/ Achiwa (12)/ OG (4)Randle (33)/ Ingram (10) / OG (5)Ingram (22)/ OG (20) / Hart (6)DDV (25)/Hart(20)/ OG (5)Brunson (35)/ Alvarado (13)Bottomline there is enough minutes to go around for the top scorersFor God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2nd Corinthians 4:6Top KnixinSixAssistant CoachPosts: 4,184And1: 1,942Joined: Jul 27, 2013Location: In the SpiritPost#1826 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:34 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1826 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:34 pm Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here?He’s mainly a 3 /4 . Even if we kept Randle it probably would look something like thisMinutes distribution IHart(32)/ Achiwa (12)/ OG (4)Randle (33)/ Ingram (10) / OG (5)Ingram (22)/ OG (20) / Hart (6)DDV (25)/Hart(20)/ OG (5)Brunson (35)/ Alvarado (13)Bottomline there is enough minutes to go around for the top scorersFor God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2nd Corinthians 4:6 - Quote Post#1826 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:34 pm Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here?He’s mainly a 3 /4 . Even if we kept Randle it probably would look something like thisMinutes distribution IHart(32)/ Achiwa (12)/ OG (4)Randle (33)/ Ingram (10) / OG (5)Ingram (22)/ OG (20) / Hart (6)DDV (25)/Hart(20)/ OG (5)Brunson (35)/ Alvarado (13)Bottomline there is enough minutes to go around for the top scorers For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2nd Corinthians 4:6 Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread spree2kawhiRealGMPosts: 10,279And1: 3,969Joined: Mar 01, 2005Post#1827 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:35 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1827 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:35 pm thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterDoesn’t Ingram have some of the Bridges issues, in that they are 3s who can only kind of play like 2s?Ingram brings more offense, that additional 3 level creator, but injury history and less defenseBridges brings more defense (or used to), not really an elite 3 level creator, more defense, mostly healthyJust not sureBrunsonIngram or BridgesOGRandleiShartReally works.Ingram really isn’t a guard. With him, our defense would take a step back and OG would have to play the 4 full time. Bridges would be the one perfect addition imo. I value defense more than offense (and I’m also ready to admit that KAT has looked terrible defensively against Dallas). Ingram would be another offensive weapon and a very good one at that, but you’d hide him on defense so if given the choice, I’d go with Bridges because he’s a two-way force.Top spree2kawhiRealGMPosts: 10,279And1: 3,969Joined: Mar 01, 2005Post#1827 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:35 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1827 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:35 pm thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterDoesn’t Ingram have some of the Bridges issues, in that they are 3s who can only kind of play like 2s?Ingram brings more offense, that additional 3 level creator, but injury history and less defenseBridges brings more defense (or used to), not really an elite 3 level creator, more defense, mostly healthyJust not sureBrunsonIngram or BridgesOGRandleiShartReally works.Ingram really isn’t a guard. With him, our defense would take a step back and OG would have to play the 4 full time. Bridges would be the one perfect addition imo. I value defense more than offense (and I’m also ready to admit that KAT has looked terrible defensively against Dallas). Ingram would be another offensive weapon and a very good one at that, but you’d hide him on defense so if given the choice, I’d go with Bridges because he’s a two-way force. - Quote Post#1827 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:35 pm thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterDoesn’t Ingram have some of the Bridges issues, in that they are 3s who can only kind of play like 2s?Ingram brings more offense, that additional 3 level creator, but injury history and less defenseBridges brings more defense (or used to), not really an elite 3 level creator, more defense, mostly healthyJust not sureBrunsonIngram or BridgesOGRandleiShartReally works.Ingram really isn’t a guard. With him, our defense would take a step back and OG would have to play the 4 full time. Bridges would be the one perfect addition imo. I value defense more than offense (and I’m also ready to admit that KAT has looked terrible defensively against Dallas). Ingram would be another offensive weapon and a very good one at that, but you’d hide him on defense so if given the choice, I’d go with Bridges because he’s a two-way force. Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread spree2kawhiRealGMPosts: 10,279And1: 3,969Joined: Mar 01, 2005Post#1828 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:37 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1828 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:37 pm KnixinSix wrote:Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here?He’s mainly a 3 /4 . Even if we kept Randle it probably would look something like thisMinutes distribution IHart(32)/ Achiwa (12)/ OG (4)Randle (33)/ Ingram (10) / OG (5)Ingram (22)/ OG (20) / Hart (6)DDV (25)/Hart(20)/ OG (5)Brunson (35)/ Alvarado (13)Bottomline there is enough minutes to go around for the top scorersIt doesn’t make sense. Go after Bridges.Top spree2kawhiRealGMPosts: 10,279And1: 3,969Joined: Mar 01, 2005Post#1828 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:37 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1828 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:37 pm KnixinSix wrote:Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here?He’s mainly a 3 /4 . Even if we kept Randle it probably would look something like thisMinutes distribution IHart(32)/ Achiwa (12)/ OG (4)Randle (33)/ Ingram (10) / OG (5)Ingram (22)/ OG (20) / Hart (6)DDV (25)/Hart(20)/ OG (5)Brunson (35)/ Alvarado (13)Bottomline there is enough minutes to go around for the top scorersIt doesn’t make sense. Go after Bridges. - Quote Post#1828 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:37 pm KnixinSix wrote:Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here?He’s mainly a 3 /4 . Even if we kept Randle it probably would look something like thisMinutes distribution IHart(32)/ Achiwa (12)/ OG (4)Randle (33)/ Ingram (10) / OG (5)Ingram (22)/ OG (20) / Hart (6)DDV (25)/Hart(20)/ OG (5)Brunson (35)/ Alvarado (13)Bottomline there is enough minutes to go around for the top scorersIt doesn’t make sense. Go after Bridges. Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread KnixinSixAssistant CoachPosts: 4,184And1: 1,942Joined: Jul 27, 2013Location: In the SpiritPost#1829 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:38 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1829 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:38 pm spree2kawhi wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterDoesn’t Ingram have some of the Bridges issues, in that they are 3s who can only kind of play like 2s?Ingram brings more offense, that additional 3 level creator, but injury history and less defenseBridges brings more defense (or used to), not really an elite 3 level creator, more defense, mostly healthyJust not sureBrunsonIngram or BridgesOGRandleiShartReally works.Ingram really isn’t a guard. With him, our defense would take a step back and OG would have to play the 4 full time. Bridges would be the one perfect addition imo. I value defense more than offense (and I’m also ready to admit that KAT has looked terrible defensively against Dallas). Ingram would be another offensive weapon and a very good one at that, but you’d hide him on defense so if given the choice, I’d go with Bridges because he’s a two-way force.If we keep Randle I agree Bridges is absolutely the better fit for this roster construction and Thibs systemFor God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2nd Corinthians 4:6Top KnixinSixAssistant CoachPosts: 4,184And1: 1,942Joined: Jul 27, 2013Location: In the SpiritPost#1829 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:38 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1829 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:38 pm spree2kawhi wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterDoesn’t Ingram have some of the Bridges issues, in that they are 3s who can only kind of play like 2s?Ingram brings more offense, that additional 3 level creator, but injury history and less defenseBridges brings more defense (or used to), not really an elite 3 level creator, more defense, mostly healthyJust not sureBrunsonIngram or BridgesOGRandleiShartReally works.Ingram really isn’t a guard. With him, our defense would take a step back and OG would have to play the 4 full time. Bridges would be the one perfect addition imo. I value defense more than offense (and I’m also ready to admit that KAT has looked terrible defensively against Dallas). Ingram would be another offensive weapon and a very good one at that, but you’d hide him on defense so if given the choice, I’d go with Bridges because he’s a two-way force.If we keep Randle I agree Bridges is absolutely the better fit for this roster construction and Thibs systemFor God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2nd Corinthians 4:6 - Quote Post#1829 » by KnixinSix » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:38 pm spree2kawhi wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterDoesn’t Ingram have some of the Bridges issues, in that they are 3s who can only kind of play like 2s?Ingram brings more offense, that additional 3 level creator, but injury history and less defenseBridges brings more defense (or used to), not really an elite 3 level creator, more defense, mostly healthyJust not sureBrunsonIngram or BridgesOGRandleiShartReally works.Ingram really isn’t a guard. With him, our defense would take a step back and OG would have to play the 4 full time. Bridges would be the one perfect addition imo. I value defense more than offense (and I’m also ready to admit that KAT has looked terrible defensively against Dallas). Ingram would be another offensive weapon and a very good one at that, but you’d hide him on defense so if given the choice, I’d go with Bridges because he’s a two-way force.If we keep Randle I agree Bridges is absolutely the better fit for this roster construction and Thibs system For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2nd Corinthians 4:6 Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread HopelessKnickStarterPosts: 2,203And1: 1,725Joined: Aug 03, 2021Post#1830 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:47 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1830 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:47 pm sol537 wrote:3 team trade…NY gets: Mikal & Alvarado BRK gets: IngramPelicans get: Mitch Rob, Bogs, McBride, pick swap from BRK, #24, #25, #38 picks from NYKWho says no?Pelicans IMO. Mitch at this point is so injury prone I don’t think there is a whole lot of interest in him. On average he misses 30 games a season—that’s close to around 40% of the possible games. He has zero offensive game as well. Valanciunas IMO (whom the Pelicans are said to want to let go of) likely carries more value around the league than Mitch. Deuce is a nice asset to have but he is a bench/rotation player at this point. What you are proposing is essentially two role players and two late picks for an all-star player in his prime. Is not going to happen. If the Knicks plan on making an offer for Ingram (which I kinda doubt they will due to positions etc.) and they want to keep DD, Hart, Hartenstein out of the trade talks….they will have to trade 4 FRPs or more IMO. A 24th and 25th pick in a weak draft isn’t worth much. The Pelicans would want unprotected FRPs in the future..2026/2028 with hopes of the Knicks being worse than today. The Pelicans just turned down the 17th pick in the draft….does not look like they are very interested in this draft. The Pelicans will likely try to get a star Point guard in return for Ingram. They have been lacking a star point guard for many years now—ever since Paul left the franchise. Ingram holds enough value to net them a Garland or Murray type player. I personally would take Ingram over Trae as well but I guess that can be debated.Top HopelessKnickStarterPosts: 2,203And1: 1,725Joined: Aug 03, 2021Post#1830 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:47 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1830 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:47 pm sol537 wrote:3 team trade…NY gets: Mikal & Alvarado BRK gets: IngramPelicans get: Mitch Rob, Bogs, McBride, pick swap from BRK, #24, #25, #38 picks from NYKWho says no?Pelicans IMO. Mitch at this point is so injury prone I don’t think there is a whole lot of interest in him. On average he misses 30 games a season—that’s close to around 40% of the possible games. He has zero offensive game as well. Valanciunas IMO (whom the Pelicans are said to want to let go of) likely carries more value around the league than Mitch. Deuce is a nice asset to have but he is a bench/rotation player at this point. What you are proposing is essentially two role players and two late picks for an all-star player in his prime. Is not going to happen. If the Knicks plan on making an offer for Ingram (which I kinda doubt they will due to positions etc.) and they want to keep DD, Hart, Hartenstein out of the trade talks….they will have to trade 4 FRPs or more IMO. A 24th and 25th pick in a weak draft isn’t worth much. The Pelicans would want unprotected FRPs in the future..2026/2028 with hopes of the Knicks being worse than today. The Pelicans just turned down the 17th pick in the draft….does not look like they are very interested in this draft. The Pelicans will likely try to get a star Point guard in return for Ingram. They have been lacking a star point guard for many years now—ever since Paul left the franchise. Ingram holds enough value to net them a Garland or Murray type player. I personally would take Ingram over Trae as well but I guess that can be debated. - Quote Post#1830 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:47 pm sol537 wrote:3 team trade…NY gets: Mikal & Alvarado BRK gets: IngramPelicans get: Mitch Rob, Bogs, McBride, pick swap from BRK, #24, #25, #38 picks from NYKWho says no?Pelicans IMO. Mitch at this point is so injury prone I don’t think there is a whole lot of interest in him. On average he misses 30 games a season—that’s close to around 40% of the possible games. He has zero offensive game as well. Valanciunas IMO (whom the Pelicans are said to want to let go of) likely carries more value around the league than Mitch. Deuce is a nice asset to have but he is a bench/rotation player at this point. What you are proposing is essentially two role players and two late picks for an all-star player in his prime. Is not going to happen. If the Knicks plan on making an offer for Ingram (which I kinda doubt they will due to positions etc.) and they want to keep DD, Hart, Hartenstein out of the trade talks….they will have to trade 4 FRPs or more IMO. A 24th and 25th pick in a weak draft isn’t worth much. The Pelicans would want unprotected FRPs in the future..2026/2028 with hopes of the Knicks being worse than today. The Pelicans just turned down the 17th pick in the draft….does not look like they are very interested in this draft. The Pelicans will likely try to get a star Point guard in return for Ingram. They have been lacking a star point guard for many years now—ever since Paul left the franchise. Ingram holds enough value to net them a Garland or Murray type player. I personally would take Ingram over Trae as well but I guess that can be debated. Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 3toheadmeloRealGMPosts: 84,939And1: 121,212Joined: Feb 15, 2015Post#1831 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:55 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1831 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:55 pm Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here?i think it can work. he used to play SG for the lakers. the pelicans are also playing another big wing next to ingram (herb jones) and a big PF zion (like randle). if he can play next to herb and randle i think he’ll be fine next to randle and og.It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect itTop 3toheadmeloRealGMPosts: 84,939And1: 121,212Joined: Feb 15, 2015Post#1831 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:55 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1831 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:55 pm Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here?i think it can work. he used to play SG for the lakers. the pelicans are also playing another big wing next to ingram (herb jones) and a big PF zion (like randle). if he can play next to herb and randle i think he’ll be fine next to randle and og.It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it- Quote Post#1831 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:55 pm Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Healthy Ingram is a beastRead on TwitterI don’t mind Ingram, but would he start at like SG here?i think it can work. he used to play SG for the lakers. the pelicans are also playing another big wing next to ingram (herb jones) and a big PF zion (like randle). if he can play next to herb and randle i think he’ll be fine next to randle and og. It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect itTop ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 3toheadmeloRealGMPosts: 84,939And1: 121,212Joined: Feb 15, 2015Post#1832 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:57 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1832 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:57 pm mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect itTop 3toheadmeloRealGMPosts: 84,939And1: 121,212Joined: Feb 15, 2015Post#1832 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:57 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1832 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:57 pm mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it- Quote Post#1832 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:57 pm mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive. It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect itTop ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread HopelessKnickStarterPosts: 2,203And1: 1,725Joined: Aug 03, 2021Post#1833 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:58 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1833 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:58 pm I agree on all guys that want Bridges here but I don’t see it. The Nets turned down a deal netting them 4 FRPs from Memphis already—that’s a small market, western conference team that the Nets would have no problem dealing with. Imagine what Bridges would cost if the Nets were to send him here. From everything one reads they are looking to pair Bridges with another star player, not trade him in a deal for another star player. They want to improve and improve fast. But given his game…offense/defense and overall ability..Bridges would be pretty perfect. He would take us from title contenders to overwhelming title favorites IMO. Having Brunson, Deuce, DD, Hart, Bridges, OG on the perimeter would be a dream come true.Top HopelessKnickStarterPosts: 2,203And1: 1,725Joined: Aug 03, 2021Post#1833 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:58 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1833 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:58 pm I agree on all guys that want Bridges here but I don’t see it. The Nets turned down a deal netting them 4 FRPs from Memphis already—that’s a small market, western conference team that the Nets would have no problem dealing with. Imagine what Bridges would cost if the Nets were to send him here. From everything one reads they are looking to pair Bridges with another star player, not trade him in a deal for another star player. They want to improve and improve fast. But given his game…offense/defense and overall ability..Bridges would be pretty perfect. He would take us from title contenders to overwhelming title favorites IMO. Having Brunson, Deuce, DD, Hart, Bridges, OG on the perimeter would be a dream come true. - Quote Post#1833 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 3:58 pm I agree on all guys that want Bridges here but I don’t see it. The Nets turned down a deal netting them 4 FRPs from Memphis already—that’s a small market, western conference team that the Nets would have no problem dealing with. Imagine what Bridges would cost if the Nets were to send him here. From everything one reads they are looking to pair Bridges with another star player, not trade him in a deal for another star player. They want to improve and improve fast. But given his game…offense/defense and overall ability..Bridges would be pretty perfect. He would take us from title contenders to overwhelming title favorites IMO. Having Brunson, Deuce, DD, Hart, Bridges, OG on the perimeter would be a dream come true. Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread HopelessKnickStarterPosts: 2,203And1: 1,725Joined: Aug 03, 2021Post#1834 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:00 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1834 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:00 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?Top HopelessKnickStarterPosts: 2,203And1: 1,725Joined: Aug 03, 2021Post#1834 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:00 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1834 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:00 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it? - Quote Post#1834 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:00 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it? Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread JayTWillJuniorPosts: 381And1: 163Joined: May 14, 2011Post#1835 » by JayTWill » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:02 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1835 » by JayTWill » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:02 pm If the Knicks were to trade Mitch or lose iHart in free-agency(hopefully not) I would love to pick up Goga Bitadze as a backup. He protects the rim, rebounds and has also shown some ability to pass out of the high post like iHart. I feel like he could be another under the radar great value pick up similar to how iHart was a few years ago.Top JayTWillJuniorPosts: 381And1: 163Joined: May 14, 2011Post#1835 » by JayTWill » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:02 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1835 » by JayTWill » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:02 pm If the Knicks were to trade Mitch or lose iHart in free-agency(hopefully not) I would love to pick up Goga Bitadze as a backup. He protects the rim, rebounds and has also shown some ability to pass out of the high post like iHart. I feel like he could be another under the radar great value pick up similar to how iHart was a few years ago. - Quote Post#1835 » by JayTWill » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:02 pm If the Knicks were to trade Mitch or lose iHart in free-agency(hopefully not) I would love to pick up Goga Bitadze as a backup. He protects the rim, rebounds and has also shown some ability to pass out of the high post like iHart. I feel like he could be another under the radar great value pick up similar to how iHart was a few years ago. Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 3toheadmeloRealGMPosts: 84,939And1: 121,212Joined: Feb 15, 2015Post#1836 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:08 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1836 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:08 pm HopelessKnick wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength.It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect itTop 3toheadmeloRealGMPosts: 84,939And1: 121,212Joined: Feb 15, 2015Post#1836 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:08 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1836 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:08 pm HopelessKnick wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength.It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it- Quote Post#1836 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:08 pm HopelessKnick wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength. It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect itTop ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread spree2kawhiRealGMPosts: 10,279And1: 3,969Joined: Mar 01, 2005Post#1837 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:22 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1837 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:22 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength.Well, as always, it is an exaggeration or even false because Bridges does in fact still play lockdown defense and Ingram never has.Top spree2kawhiRealGMPosts: 10,279And1: 3,969Joined: Mar 01, 2005Post#1837 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:22 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1837 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:22 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength.Well, as always, it is an exaggeration or even false because Bridges does in fact still play lockdown defense and Ingram never has. - Quote Post#1837 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:22 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength.Well, as always, it is an exaggeration or even false because Bridges does in fact still play lockdown defense and Ingram never has. Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread thebuzzardmanRealGMPosts: 74,565And1: 83,161Joined: Jun 24, 2006Location: VillanovknicksPost#1838 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:24 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1838 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:24 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength.I think Ingram would cost 4 picks.Top thebuzzardmanRealGMPosts: 74,565And1: 83,161Joined: Jun 24, 2006Location: VillanovknicksPost#1838 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:24 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1838 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:24 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength.I think Ingram would cost 4 picks.- Quote Post#1838 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:24 pm 3toheadmelo wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:mikal hasn’t played defense in years and a terrible shot creator. ingram is a better fit offensively since he can create and play off the ball and both play the same levels of defense. it’s a no brainer which one to take.and also the nets aren’t even looking to trade mikal. so there’s no point even debating about that. he would also be way more expensive.He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength.I think Ingram would cost 4 picks. Top ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 3toheadmeloRealGMPosts: 84,939And1: 121,212Joined: Feb 15, 2015Post#1839 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:34 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1839 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:34 pm spree2kawhi wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength.Well, as always, it is an exaggeration or even false because Bridges does in fact still play lockdown defense and Ingram never has. How much Nets games have you seen in the past 2 years? Read on TwitterHighest Opponent Corner 3-Point Percentage Among Guards This Season (Min. 400 Total 3PA) :1. Mikal Bridges — 43.7%2. Coby White — 42.4%2. Jordan Poole — 42.4%4. Max Strus — 42.3%5. Donte DiVincenzo — 42.2%6. Ayo Dosunmu — 41.9%7. DeMar DeRozan — 41.5%8. Dejounte Murray — 41.4%9. Saddiq Bey — 41.4%10. Jalen Brunson — 41.3%Read on TwitterRead on TwitterDo i need to post stuff about what Nets fans feel about him on defense too? Dude sucks on that end now. You’re not living in reality.It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect itTop 3toheadmeloRealGMPosts: 84,939And1: 121,212Joined: Feb 15, 2015Post#1839 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:34 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1839 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:34 pm spree2kawhi wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength.Well, as always, it is an exaggeration or even false because Bridges does in fact still play lockdown defense and Ingram never has. How much Nets games have you seen in the past 2 years? Read on TwitterHighest Opponent Corner 3-Point Percentage Among Guards This Season (Min. 400 Total 3PA) :1. Mikal Bridges — 43.7%2. Coby White — 42.4%2. Jordan Poole — 42.4%4. Max Strus — 42.3%5. Donte DiVincenzo — 42.2%6. Ayo Dosunmu — 41.9%7. DeMar DeRozan — 41.5%8. Dejounte Murray — 41.4%9. Saddiq Bey — 41.4%10. Jalen Brunson — 41.3%Read on TwitterRead on TwitterDo i need to post stuff about what Nets fans feel about him on defense too? Dude sucks on that end now. You’re not living in reality.It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it- Quote Post#1839 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:34 pm spree2kawhi wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:He was great defensively for Phoenix….so years is a little exaggeration, isn’t it?He hasn’t played defense in 2 years. Not an exaggeration. He’s been playing with a lack of effort and has been regressing on both ends. He’s been so bad that Nets fans value Cam Thomas way more than Mikal now. Idk why you guys are even talking so much about Mikal every single day.. nets aren’t trading him and we would have to give up a bunch of picks and players to meet the Nets demand. Those guys already turned down Jalen Green and picks. It’s just not happening.Give me Ingram for cheaper who’s a much better player at full strength.Well, as always, it is an exaggeration or even false because Bridges does in fact still play lockdown defense and Ingram never has. How much Nets games have you seen in the past 2 years? Read on TwitterHighest Opponent Corner 3-Point Percentage Among Guards This Season (Min. 400 Total 3PA) :1. Mikal Bridges — 43.7%2. Coby White — 42.4%2. Jordan Poole — 42.4%4. Max Strus — 42.3%5. Donte DiVincenzo — 42.2%6. Ayo Dosunmu — 41.9%7. DeMar DeRozan — 41.5%8. Dejounte Murray — 41.4%9. Saddiq Bey — 41.4%10. Jalen Brunson — 41.3%Read on TwitterRead on TwitterDo i need to post stuff about what Nets fans feel about him on defense too? Dude sucks on that end now. You’re not living in reality. It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect itTop ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread HopelessKnickStarterPosts: 2,203And1: 1,725Joined: Aug 03, 2021Post#1840 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:43 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1840 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:43 pm He is 26years….I bet under Thibs in NY he would go back to his lockdown defense in no time. I do agree however that the Nets are extremely unlikely to trade him.Top HopelessKnickStarterPosts: 2,203And1: 1,725Joined: Aug 03, 2021Post#1840 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:43 pm ### Re: Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread
• Quote Post#1840 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:43 pm He is 26years….I bet under Thibs in NY he would go back to his lockdown defense in no time. I do agree however that the Nets are extremely unlikely to trade him. - Quote Post#1840 » by HopelessKnick » Sat Jun 1, 2024 4:43 pm He is 26years….I bet under Thibs in NY he would go back to his lockdown defense in no time. I do agree however that the Nets are extremely unlikely to trade him. Top Post Reply - Print view 1979 posts - Page 92 of 99
• Jump to page:
• Previous
• 1
• …
• 90
• 91
• 92
• 93
• 94
• …
• 99
• Next Return to New York Knicks Jump to - Forum Rules
• Forum Rules and F.A.Q
• Sports Talk
• RealGM Basketball
• Top Basketball Boards
• The General Board
• Player Comparisons
• Trades and Transactions
• Trades and Transactions Games
• WNBA
• Fantasy Basketball
• Fantasy Basketball Leagues
• Gambling
• NBA Draft
• Mock Drafts
• CBA & Business
• Statistical Analysis
• International Basketball
• National Team Competitions
• NCAA Basketball
• NCAA Tournaments
• NBA Team Forums
• Atlanta Hawks
• Boston Celtics
• Brooklyn Nets
• Charlotte Hornets
• Chicago Bulls
• Cleveland Cavaliers
• Dallas Mavericks
• Denver Nuggets
• Detroit Pistons
• Golden State Warriors
• Houston Rockets
• Indiana Pacers
• Los Angeles Clippers
• Los Angeles Lakers
• Memphis Grizzlies
• Miami Heat
• Milwaukee Bucks
• Minnesota Timberwolves
• New Orleans Pelicans
• New York Knicks
• Oklahoma City Thunder
• Orlando Magic
• Philadelphia 76ers
• Phoenix Suns
• Portland Trail Blazers
• Sacramento Kings
• San Antonio Spurs
• Toronto Raptors
• Utah Jazz
• Washington Wizards
• More Boards
• Seattle Supersonics Basketball
• G League
• Minor Leagues
• High School Basketball
• Wiretap Discussion
• Articles Discussion
• Polls Discussion
• RealGM Support
• Feedback & Suggestions
• Global Announcements
• Mass Dispatch
• “Beat The Commish”
• RealGM Baseball
• Top Baseball Boards
• The General MLB Board
• Player Comparisons
• Trades and Transactions
• Minor Leagues
• Fantasy Baseball
• Wiretap Headlines Discussion
• Articles Discussion
• Polls Discussion
• MLB Team Forums
• Arizona Diamondbacks
• Atlanta Braves
• Baltimore Orioles
• Boston Red Sox
• Chicago Cubs
• Chicago White Sox
• Cincinnati Reds
• Cleveland Indians
• Colorado Rockies
• Detroit Tigers
• Houston Astros
• Kansas City Royals
• Los Angeles Angels
• Los Angeles Dodgers
• Miami Marlins
• Milwaukee Brewers
• Minnesota Twins
• New York Mets
• New York Yankees
• Oakland Athletics
• Philadelphia Phillies
• Pittsburgh Pirates
• San Diego Padres
• San Francisco Giants
• Seattle Mariners
• St. Louis Cardinals
• Tampa Bay Rays
• Texas Rangers
• Toronto Blue Jays
• Washington Nationals
• RealGM Support
• Feedback & Suggestions
• Global Announcements
• Mass Dispatch
• RealGM Football
• Top Football Boards
• The General NFL Board
• Player Comparisons
• NFL Draft
• NCAA Football
• Fantasy Football
• Wiretap Headlines Discussion
• Articles Discussion
• Polls Discussion
• NFL Team Forums
• Arizona Cardinals
• Atlanta Falcons
• Baltimore Ravens
• Buffalo Bills
• Carolina Panthers
• Chicago Bears
• Cincinnati Bengals
• Cleveland Browns
• Dallas Cowboys
• Denver Broncos
• Detroit Lions
• Green Bay Packers
• Houston Texans
• Indianapolis Colts
• Jacksonville Jaguars
• Kansas City Chiefs
• Las Vegas Raiders
• Los Angeles Chargers
• Los Angeles Rams
• Miami Dolphins
• Minnesota Vikings
• New England Patriots
• New Orleans Saints
• New York Giants
• New York Jets
• Philadelphia Eagles
• Pittsburgh Steelers
• San Francisco 49ers
• Seattle Seahawks
• Seattle Supersonics
• Tampa Bay Buccaneers
• Tennessee Titans
• Washington Football Team
• RealGM Support
• Feedback & Suggestions
• Global Announcements
• Mass Dispatch
• “Beat The Commish”
• RealGM Hockey
• Top Hockey Boards
• The General NHL Board
• Junior and International Hockey
• Trades and Transactions
• Fantasy Hockey
• NHL Draft
• Player Comparisons
• Wiretap Headlines Discussion
• Articles Discussion
• Polls Discussion
• NHL Team Forums
• Anaheim Ducks
• Arizona Coyotes
• Boston Bruins
• Buffalo Sabres
• Calgary Flames
• Carolina Hurricanes
• Chicago Blackhawks
• Colorado Avalanche
• Columbus Blue Jackets
• Dallas Stars
• Detroit Red Wings
• Edmonton Oilers
• Florida Panthers
• Los Angeles Kings
• Minnesota Wild
• Montreal Canadiens
• Nashville Predators
• New Jersey Devils
• New York Islanders
• New York Rangers
• Ottawa Senators
• Philadelphia Flyers
• Pittsburgh Penguins
• San Jose Sharks
• Seattle Kraken
• St. Louis Blues
• Tampa Bay Lightning
• Toronto Maple Leafs
• Vancouver Canucks
• Vegas Golden Knights
• Washington Capitals
• Winnipeg Jets
• RealGM Support
• Feedback & Suggestions
• Global Announcements
• Mass Dispatch
• RealGM Soccer
• Top Soccer Boards
• The General Soccer Board
• Major League Soccer
• Wiretap Headlines Discussion
• Articles Discussion
• Polls Discussion
• Other Sports
• Top Boards
• Boxing & Mixed Martial Arts
• Pro Wrestling
• General Other Sports Talk
• Olympics
• RealGM Support
• Feedback & Suggestions
• Global Announcements
• Mass Dispatch
• RealGM Support
• Feedback & Suggestions
• Global Announcements
• Mass Dispatch
• RealGM Support
• Feedback and Suggestions
• Global Announcements
• Mass Dispatch
• “Beat The Commish”

This site only collects related articles. Viewing the original, please copy and open the following link:RealGM Forums